January 5, 2012

Nebraska Corn Board appreciates ruling on low carbon fuel standard

Share:
In a news release, the Nebraska Corn Board said it was pleased when Judge Lawrence J. O’Neill struck down California’s low carbon fuel standard last week (see this blog post for more).

The judge found the standard unconstitutional by means of violating the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution.

"This is a great victory for Nebraska’s ethanol and corn industries and Nebraska’s economy as a whole," said Tim Scheer, a farmer from St. Paul and vice chairman of the Nebraska Corn Board. "This judgment will mean that the largest fuel market in the U.S. will continue to be open to the benefits of corn ethanol produced right here in Nebraska and the Midwest."

The low carbon fuel standard that had been in effect since April of last year had the goal of reducing green house gas emissions from transportation fuels by 10 percent by 2020. While this was as admirable goal, it had many flaws including penalizing Midwest produced corn ethanol in favor of California ethanol.

"This is what the Judge ultimately struck down in his ruling," said Kelly Brunkhorst, director of research for the Nebraska Corn Board. The judgment also prohibits the enforcement of the low carbon fuel standard while the litigation or possible appeal is ongoing.

With 25 plants operating and producing nearly 2 billion gallons of ethanol in Nebraska, California’s 15 billion gallon transportation fuel market was an important destination for Nebraska. "If we would have been shut out of that key market, it would have been devastating to Nebraska and other mid-western states," Brunkhorst said.

The original lawsuit challenging California’s low carbon fuel standard was filed by the Renewable Fuels Association, Growth Energy, Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, Redwood County Minnesota Corn and Soybean Growers and Penny Newman Grain against the California Air Resources Board in December of 2009.

The Nebraska Corn Board said it appreciated the Nebraska Attorney General’s office and five other state attorney generals for filing an amicus brief in support of the lawsuit.

No comments:

Post a Comment