In today’s world it could be easy to think that the idea of
“sustainability” is a new concept. After
all, it’s been just in the last couple years that we’ve seen an influx in
advertisements and product labels carrying such phrases as “Produced
Sustainably” or “Sustainably Sourced”. But
what exactly does sustainability mean? While
the exact definition is often up for debate and may vary between groups,
commonly referenced principles of sustainability within agriculture include:
Maintaining or increasing production using fewer
inputs
Adopting strategies or developing new practices
that lessen environmental impact
Seeking continuous improvement in agricultural
productivity across the entire supply chain
These principles are far from being new concepts to
Nebraska’s corn farmers who understand that “sustainability” is more than
merely a marketing term. As stewards of
the land, sustainability is a necessity for farmers to meet the increasing
food, fiber, and fuel needs of a growing world, while preserving resources for
all uses and to be enjoyed by future generations.
While principles of sustainability are not new to farmers,
there is always room to improve on what is already being done through new and
innovative methods. This is what
researchers at the University of Nebraska – Lincoln (UNL) hope to achieve with
Project SENSE.
Project SENSE, or Sensors for Efficient Nitrogen Use and
Stewardship of the Environment, is a research project conducted by UNL in partnership
with 5 Nebraska Natural Resource Districts (NRDs) and the Nebraska Corn
Board. Project SENSE seeks to increase
nitrogen use efficiency in corn production and reduce environmental impact of
nitrogen use on groundwater quality by utilizing crop canopy sensors.
Nitrogen is one of the most important elements for plants,
and successful nitrogen management is critically important in optimizing crop
yields. Although nitrogen is naturally
found in air and soil, it’s generally in a form that is not directly available
to most plants, or not available in the amount that plants need. Farmers are able to get around this by
applying the usable form of nitrogen (nitrate or ammonium) to their fields – an
added input expense that doesn’t come without its challenges.
Two of the biggest challenges a farmer faces are determining
the timing of the nitrogen application and the rate to be applied. Nitrogen applied too early holds the risk of
being lost through leaching before the crop takes it up. Leaching occurs because nitrate is not held
well by soil and therefore can be washed below the root zone of plants
especially after large rains. The ideal
time to apply nitrogen fertilizer is during the growing season, just before the
crop’s maximum demand for nitrogen.
However, waiting too long to apply runs the risk of logistic or weather
conditions not allowing application when planned. In addition, due to nitrogen’s complex
behavior of changing between forms and being highly mobile in soil, soil
testing for available nitrogen may give a reading that is only valid at the time
of testing, leading to application rate recommendations that may be too high or
too low for the plant’s needs.
A key component of Project SENSE is the use of crop canopy
sensors to mitigate these challenges.
The sensors are installed on high clearance equipment which allows for
application of nitrogen fertilizer during the growing season of corn when
nitrogen is most needed and taken up by the plant. The sensors themselves measure light
reflectance off canopy leaves which correlates to the nitrogen status of the
crop and is used to generate real-time optimal rates of nitrogen to be applied
as the farmer drives through the field.
In terms of sustainability, the ability to apply the optimal
amount of nitrogen at the right time clearly has the potential to lessen the
environmental impact caused by nitrogen leaching. However, Project SENSE also demonstrates an
often overlooked component of sustainability – economic sustainability. If a production practice can’t be sustained
financially, it won’t be adopted by producers.
The use of sensors to generate the economic optimum rate aims to achieve
stable or increased yields while also using less fertilizer, resulting in
increased profit.
In 2015, 17 Nebraska On-Farm Research Network grower sites
were implemented as part of the project, and preliminary results are promising. At each site, the study compared the grower’s
normal nitrogen management approach to the Project SENSE nitrogen management
approach. Over all sites combined, Project
SENSE resulted in a reduction of nitrogen by 40 lbs/ac compared to the grower’s
nitrogen management approach. Although
an average yield loss of 5 bushels per acre was also observed with Project
SENSE, the economic savings from the reduced nitrogen application translated to
a marginal net return of $7.75 per acre above that achieved using the growers’
standard nitrogen management practices.
Project SENSE does more than just demonstrate the potential
for improved nitrogen use efficiency using sensor-based application, it also
challenges farmers to think about nitrogen management differently and encourage
the adoption of strategies that are both environmentally and economically
beneficial. In terms of seeking
continuous improvement to enhance the sustainability in agriculture production,
Project SENSE is one example of how corn checkoff funds are supporting research
to meet the challenges faced by Nebraska‘s corn farmers. Watch the video below or click here for a 360 experience of Project SENSE from inside the applicator cab... *Tilt or drag to move around!*
A recent impact study by University of Nebraska-Lincoln economists reveals Nebraska’s ethanol production capacity growth between 1995 and 2014 is tenfold. The results of the “Economic Impacts of the Ethanol Industry in Nebraska” study were released in March 2015.
The authors – Dr. Kathleen Brooks, UNL agricultural economics professor; Dr. Dennis Conley, UNL agricultural economics professor; Dr. Eric Thompson, UNL economics professor and Bureau of Business Research director; and Dr. Cory Walters, UNL agricultural economics professor – examined the economic impact of Nebraska’s ethanol industry during the last five years.
As of June 2014, Nebraska’s production capacity was 2,077 million gallons per year with 1,301 full-time employees at 24 facilities. During the past five years, Nebraska’s value of production for ethanol and dried distillers grain with solubles (DDGS) ranged from slightly less than $4 billion to more than $6.6 billion.
“The quantifiable economic impact of ethanol production on the Nebraska economy is clear,” said Paul Kenney, chairman of the Nebraska Ethanol Board. “But we should also understand the enormous savings in health and environmental costs associated with displacing toxic petroleum products with cleaner burning biofuels like ethanol. Choosing ethanol fuels brings additional cost savings in terms of our health.”
Nebraska’s large ethanol production results in 96 percent (1.805 billion gallons) being shipped out of state and makes Nebraska one of the largest exporters of bioenergy. In addition, 58 percent of DDGS produced in 2014 were shipped out of state. These out-of-state shipments result in a net positive for the state and represent a direct economic impact by bringing new money into the state economy.
The study noted that Nebraska’s ethanol industry could be affected by emerging trends and at least four are worth watching – the recovery of carbon dioxide (CO2), the extraction of corn oil, and world export markets for both ethanol and DDGS. Many of these upcoming trends will be discussed later this week during the annual Ethanol 2015: Emerging Issues Forum in Omaha April 16-17.
“Canada imports 40 percent of the U.S. ethanol exports and China imports 39 percent of the U.S. distillers grains,” said Todd Sneller, Nebraska Ethanol Board administrator. “There is a strong demand throughout the world for ethanol and its co-products, so we continue to look for ways to expand the Nebraska market as well as international markets in an effort to bring more economic prosperity to Nebraska.”
The purpose of the “Economic Impacts of the Ethanol Industry in Nebraska” study was to estimate the value of production during five years and compare that value to major commodity production values in Nebraska. In addition, the study measured productive capacity, employment, net returns, in-state utilization and out-of-state shipments. To view the full study, click here.
In this podcast, Tim Scheer, chairman of the Nebraska Corn Boardand farmer from St. Paul, Nebraska, reflects on a few of highlights of Nebraska Corn Board's activity throughout 2014. From encouraging some 6,000 Nebraska farmers and ethanol advocates to submit comments to the EPA on their proposed changes to the Renewable Fuel Standard, to supporting the development of the "Raising Nebraska" exhibit at the Nebraska State Fair, to funding a new Presidential Chair faculty position at University of Nebraska-Lincoln that will focus on corn research, 2014 has been quite an eventful year for the Nebraska Corn Industry!